Prosecutors Don’t Know Who Killed Bryan Kocis
January 23, 2008 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial
Luzerne County prosecutors say they shouldn’t have to say right now if Joseph Kerekes killed Bryan Kocis or was just an accomplice in the Dallas man’s Jan. 24, 2007, death, according to papers filed Tuesday in court.
Furthermore, the documents state, by revealing who is the primary killer, it creates an “irrevocable theory of the case when the principal versus accomplice issue should rightfully be decided by a jury.” The Citizens Voice
If you read between the lines of the “argument” presented by Prosecutors in Luzerne County, Luzerrne County has no fucking idea WHO killed Bryan Kocis nor WHEN Bryan Kocis was killed.
Prosecutors are asking the Court to NOT pen them down as to a definite THEORY OF THE CRIME on how and when Bryan Kocis was Killed becuase they don’t know how and when Bryan Kocis was killed.
WILKES-BARRE – Luzerne County prosecutors say they don’t have to reveal whether they believe homicide suspect Joseph Kerekes was the principal killer of Bryan Kocis or just an accomplice. Timesleader
It seems to me that the main reason a prosecutor would not want to be penned down on a definite theory of the Crime is because the Prosecutor has no fucking clue how the crime was committed. WHAT THIS MEANS is that Prosecutors in Luzerne County have No DNA Evidence ag;ainst Cuadra and Kerekes, they have No Murder Weapon that was used to commit the crime, they have No Time of Death for Bryan Kocis AND YET, Prosecutors still want two guys put to death for killing Bryan Kocis.
Does anyone need a better reason to call up their friends and family and to tell them all to never set foot in Luzerne County?
BTW, this strategy by Prosecutors of not committing to a definite theory of the crime, it seems to me, can only work if trials for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes are combined. Gven case law in Luzerne County, it seems highly unlikely that Cuadra and Kerekes will be tried together. Since Cuadra is alleged to have incriminated Kerekes on the Blacks Beach Tapes, Kerekes has a legal right to cross-examine Cuadra on the witness stand and the would require that Cuadra’s trial be separate from Kerkes’ trial.
Federal Investigators and The Bryan Kocis Murder
You have to wonder if Federal Authorities who participated in the Bryan Kocis Murder Investigation are hoping like hell that they WON’T be called as witnesses at a trial.
I can see how Federal Authorities would have just ASSUMED that everything about Bryan Kocis was above board when they agreed to help in the murder investigation. HOWEVER,
Now that Federal Authorities have to have a better idea of exactly what Bryan Kocis was and exactly what Bryan Kocis was doing in Luzerne County, you gotta think that Federal Authorities would never have agreed to AID in any investigation of Cuadra and Kerekes for the murder of Bryan Kocis had they known all of the facts about Bryan Kocis’ “life and times” in Luzerne County. You have to think that Federal Authorities don’t want to be publicly identified with Luzerne County nor with having had anything to do with any investigation into the Murder of Bryan Kocis.
Arrest Affidavit of Harlow Cuadra Creates Irrevocable Theory of the Case
Prosecutors argue that they should not have to declare WHO they believe actually killed Bryan Kocis and WHEN because doing so “creates an irrevocable theory of the case”. Doesn’t the Arrest Affidavit for Harlow Cuadra create an irrevocable theory of the case?
The Arrest Affidavit for Harlow Cuadra is a document created by someone who swore under oath under penalty of perjury that:
1. Sean Lockhart was CONTRACTUALLY BOUND to Bryan Kocis and Cobra Video to perform gay bareback sex acts for money; and
2. That Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes killed Bryan Kocis to FREE Sean Lockhart from his Contract with Bryan Kocis/Cobra Video, so that Lockhart could do work for Boybatter.com (the company that was owned by Cuadra and Kerekes).
As you all should know by now, there is this little minor problem with the above “irrevocable theory of the case”, Contracts for Sex are Void and Unenforceable. The only legal way that Sean Lockhart could have been CONTRACTUALLY BOUND to Bryan Kocis/Cobra Video was if his contract was signed and if performance was required in a county in Nevada where prostitution is legal.
I would wager that the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas is probably the only Court in America where a Prosecutor could have actually filed an affidavit in which a person swears under penalty of perjury that an agreement to perform sex acts for money is a valid and enforceable contract.
It could even be argued to a Legitimate Court that asking A Legitimate Court to even entertain the argument that contracts for sex could be valid and enforceable is Offensive to The Court under the doctrine of UNCLEAN HANDS.






