more Bryan Kocis Time of Death Propaganda

September 28, 2008 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

Investigators were able to allege that Cuadra and Kerekes, both from Virginia Beach, Va., were near Kocis’ Midland Drive home the night Kocis was killed because they traced their cell phone signals to three towers in the Wyoming Valley, including one just 100 yards from Kocis’ home. Timesleader

The Night Bryan Kocis was Killed? Exactly what night might that be? And,

While it may be possible to trace signals from cell phones owned by Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes to towers near Bryan Kocis’ house, the only way anyone could prove that Cuadra and Kerekes made the referenced telephone calls would be if a witness saw Cuadra and Kerekes talking on their cell phones at the times that the telephone company records showed signals from Cuadra’s and Kerekes’ cell phones bouncing off of towers near Bryan Kocis’ house.

Do you see how statements in a newspaper that appear to make sense are really nothing more than propaganda? If Luzerne County has an ironclad case against Cuadra and Kerekes, why is there this endless bullshit (instead of facts) on when Kocis was killed?

Again, I guess if the newspapers in Luzerne County print enough articles enough times claiming that Bryan Kocis was killed on the day Kocis’ Smoking Corpse was found in his house, then everyone will just assume that it is a given that Byran Kocis was killed the day his body was found.

CSI and The Bryan Kocis Murder

1. Bryan Kocis’ Time of Death. The Ultimate example of expert CSI methods would be / would have been if investigators in Luzerne County did that new test to determine time of death on a burned corpse. The test involves measuring the dissipation of certain minerals from the victim’s eyes over time. In order to perform the test, the victim’s eyes must not have been damaged during the crime. There is no evidence that Luzerne County did this test to determine Bryan Kocis’ time of death. If Luzerne County could scientifically prove that Bryan Kocis was killed on the day Kocis’ body was found, there would not be this endless propaganda out of Luzerne County on Bryan Kocis’ time of death.

2. GPS Data on Rental Car Cuadra and Kerekes are alleged to have rented. If Luzerne County was “on to” Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes from the git go, as some allege, why haven’t we heard anything about Luzerne County investigators having GPS Data from the Rental Car that Cuadra and Kerekes were supposed to have rented? Isn’t it likely that a rental car company would have GPS equipment in its cars? If you knew that two guys had rented a car to kill someone in your county, wouldn’t you get a search warrant for the GPS data on the rental car?

3. DNA and Fingerprint evidence from Bryan Kocis’ House. There is not likely to be any DNA or fingerprint evidence presented by Prosecutors on anything from Bryan Kocis’s house because DNA and Fingerprint evidence from Kocis’ House would open up a can of worms. Take a guess on how many boys went through Bryan Kocis’ house during Kocis’ idiot fucking life. There is likely to be so much unidentified DNA and Fingerprint Evidence (pointing to other possible suspects) from tests on anything from Bryan Kocis’ house that it is highly unlikely that Luzerne County Prosecutors will open up that can of worms by presenting any DNA or Fingerprint evidence at any trial. It is more likely than not that Bryan Kocis’ house was demolished to PREVENT anyone from obtaining DNA and Fingerprint evidence from shit in Kocis’ house.

If The Defense Teams for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes are really on the ball, The Defense Teams for Cuadra and Kerekes would do DNA Tests on shit from Kocis’ House specifically to introduce Unidentified Persons and other possible suspects into The Bryan Kocis Murder Trial (creating reasonable doubt in the process).

Lack of Technology in Bryan Kocis Murder

The Bryan Kocis Murder investigation is based entirely on Luzerne County Prosecutors getting a jury to assume facts that Prosecutors can’t prove.

1. Prosecutors can’t prove that Cuadra and Kerekes were the persons on their computers sending the emails that Prosecutors tracked.

2. Prosecutors can’t prove WHEN Bryan Kocis was killed.

3. Prosecutors can’t prove that there weren’t other people using Cuadra’s and Kerekes’ cell phones. And, more importantly, nobody on the planet is capable of separating actions done by Cuadra from Actions done by Kerekes. It seems to me that Luzerne County Prosecutors falling back and saying they both did it all will be seen for the bullshit it is by any court of appeals. Although, being reversed on appeal is probably NOT A CONCERN for an inbred little shit court system like The Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas – A Court system where the Judiciary, The Prosecution and The Public Defender all appear to be in bed together (and, going to prison together).

For 500 children to be convicted of crimes without lawyers, the Judiciary, the Prosecution and The Public Defender’s Office in Luzerne County ALL had to be operating under the same game plan.

America vs Luzerne County Pennsylvania

September 10, 2008 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

Video Gap Band – You Dropped A Bomb On Me

Well, it’s been a hoot but, it’s time to SHUT DOWN The Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas.

FROM WHERE WE SIT, It would amount to MALPRACTICE for The Defense Teams for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes to NOT present the alternate theory of the crime that has Bryan Kocis being murdered to prevent Kocis from testifying in a federal probe into how Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea was changed in 2006.

If the Defense Teams for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes DON’T raise the “Alternate Theory of the Crime”, then maybe the families of Cuadra and Kerekes and we the public should raise the alternate theory of the crime to the FBI and mail certified copies of said letter to The Judge, Prosecutors and The Defense Teams in the Bryan Kocis Murder Case. EITHER WAY, once The Alternate Theory of the Crime Bomb is dropped, The Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas should in no way shape or form be capable of conducting a Bryan Kocis Murder Trial for Cuadra, Kerekes or anyone else.

Once the Alternate Theory of The Crime Bomb is Dropped, The Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas and the Luzerne County DA should be required to recuse themselves from anything and everything to do with the Murder of Bryan Kocis because of the part the Luzerne County DA and the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas played in “correcting” Bryan Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea in 2006.

If the Luzerne County DA’s Office wasn’t full of total idiots, the Luzerne County DA would have already recused itself from the prosecution of Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes because the Luzerne County DA was a party to “correcting” Bryan Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea FOUR YEARS LATER in 2006.

The Alternate Theory of the Crime Bomb

As we recall, The Luzerne County District Attorney has a motion before Judge Olszweski asking that The Defense Teams for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes not be allowed to reference Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea. The REASON The Luzerne County DA doesn’t want any refernce made to Bryan Kocis 2002 Guilty Plea has a shit load to do with the CORRECTION MADE to Bryan Kocis 2002 Guilty Plea in 2006.

IN BRIEF, Bryan Kocis’ originally recorded 2002 guilty plea was to a crime that required that Bryan Kocis register as a Sex Offender. Bryan Kocis DID NOT register as a sex offender in 2002 and, in 2006, Bryan Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea was changed to a plea that DID NOT require that Kocis register as a sex offender. THE GOING GOSSIP is that Bryan Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea was “corrected” in 2006 AFTER the State began asking The Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas why Bryan Kocis hadn’t register as a sex offender as required by his recorded 2002 guilty plea and Megans Law.

It is a third degree felony for anyone to have done anything to SUBVERT the requirements of Megan’s Law in Pennsylania by helping Bryan Kocis EVADE registering as a sex offender.

Harlow Cuadra Killed in Early Morning Raid Part III

September 7, 2008 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

<center>IPB Image <br> A Very Much Alive Harlow Cuadra<br>Demanding a Murder Trial</center>
Further proof that Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes were supposed to die in the early morning raid of their Virginia Beach home. Unsigned search warrants, botched/unsigned arrest warrants … Clearly, nobody expected Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes to survive the early morning assault on their home by ARMED state and federal agents.

Attorneys for accused killer Joseph Kerekes filed a brief in support of a previous motion to suppress evidence Virginia authorities seized after his 2007 arrest in Virginia.

The document, filed Friday in Luzerne County Court, argued Kerekes’ car was searched illegally, and that a knife seized by Virginia authorities had nothing to do with his alleged criminal activity in that state. Citizensvoice

Get Harlow From the Git Go!

Someone needs to explain to us what it was that convinced Luzerne County Investigators that Harlow Cuadra was their man for The Murder of Bryan Kocis[b]. AS FAR AS WE CAN TELL, there was [b]no fingerprint evidence, no DNA evidence and no eyewitnesses pointing to Harlow Cuadra for the Murder of Bryan Kocis. There was absolutely nothing incriminating Joseph Kerekes for the murder of Bryan Kocis, Kerekes was simply WITH Cuadra.

Is it possible that Luzerne County Prosecutors zeroed in on Harlow Cuadra on the basis of bullshit statements from Grant Roy and Sean Lockhart about Cuadra allegedly offering to get rid of Bryan Kocis? We doubt that … (since Luzerne County clearly intends to indict Roy and Lockhart once their cases against Cuadra and Kerekes go up in flames).

Could there have been some other reason why Luzerne County Prosecutors never conducted an intestigation into who might have killed Bryan Kocis? Maybe there is some other reason why Luzerne County simply went after Harlow Cuadra from the git go.

[attachmentid=2801]

Harlow Cuadra Rental Cars and GPS

September 2, 2008 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

<center>IPB Image <br>Harlow Cuadra and Sean Lockhart</center>
Experts say such evidence will almost certainly become more common in court as GPS systems become more affordable and show up in more vehicles … “There’s no real doubt,” said Alan Brill, a Minnesota-based computer forensics expert who has worked with the FBI and Secret Service. “This follows every other technology that turns out to have information of forensic value. I think what we’re seeing is evolutionary.” In criminal cases, GPS units can mark the scene of a crime. USA Today

Was there a GPS System in the Car Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes allegedly rented? There has been so much BULLSHIT EVIDENCE in The Bryan Kocis Murder Case, I don’t recall Prosecutors presenting any GPS Tracking Data on the Rental Car Prosecutors claim Cuadra and Kerekes rented. It seems to me that A Rental Company would have GPS Systems in their rental cars. I recall some bullshit about the mileage on the rental car from Prosecutors but, nothing on a GPS system in the rental car.

I’m guessing the GPS Tracking Data on the Rental Car Cuadra and Kerekes rented doesn’t support the Prosecutions theory of the crime. I mean, why would prosecutors rely on unreliable human witnesses about a Silver SUV in Bryan Kocis’ driveway when the rental car GPS System can scientifically place the rental car in Bryan Kocis’ driveway on 1/24/07. Again, I’m thinking the GPS data from the Rental Car probably DOESN’T place the rental car in Bryan Kocis’ driveway.

The Witness Lists Prosecutors have presented also don’t seem to show anyone from a Virginia Beach Rental Company

Solving a Murder vs Seeking A Conviction

We’ve pointed out here a number of times that The Job of Prosecutors is to win convictions NOT to solve crimes. The Classic Example of Prosecutors ignoring evidence that could solve a crime because it wouldn’t have helped them win a conviction against the person they wanted to convict is The Case of New York vs Paul Cortez. In the Paul Cortez Case, the murder victim was found with hair in her hand and the NYPD allegedly never did DNA testing on the hair to try to match the hair to Paul Cortez (most likely because the NYPD and Prosecutors KNEW that the hair would point to a suspect OTHER THAN Paul Cortez).

[attachmentid=2774]

Second Circuit Court of Appeals vs Backwater Luzerne County Fahkwads

September 2, 2008 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

It has occured to us that Judge Olszewski, the judge over the Bryan Kocis Murder Case, may actually be under the delusion that he is being viewed as a respected jurist by people in the legal community. You don’t find Respected Jurists in Court Systems that allowed a Child Molester to operate a Gay Bareback Porn Production Studio out of the basement of a residential house. Judge Olszewski has taken legal positions on constitutional issues that conflict with positions taken on those issues by Federal Judge Lewis Kaplan and The Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed Federal Judge Lewis Kaplan’s dismissal of criminal charges against The KPMG Defendants

A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed District Judge Lewis Kaplan’s dismissal of the indictments of 13 former KPMG executives. Judge Kaplan had ruled that the prosecutors’ pressuring of the company not to pay the defendants’ legal fees amounted to a violation of their Sixth Amendment right to counsel and their right to due process. WSJ

Which Court System do you think is best qualified to weigh in on The Constitutional Right to Choice of Counsel and The Constitutional Right to Choice of Defense Strategies, The Second Circuit Court of Appeals or, Backwater Fuckwads in Luzerne County Pennsylvania?

Judge Kaplan and the Second Circuit have taken the positions that:

1. The Constitutional Right to Legal Counsel is also a constitutional right to choice of counsel and a constitutional right to pursue a specific defense strategy.

2. That when the government makes it difficult for a defendant to hire his “counsel of choice” and for the defendant to pursue his choice of defense strategies, the government violates the defendant’s constitutional right to legal counsel.

The only purpose we can see for The RICO Charges against Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes was to make it financially difficult for Cuadra and Kerekes to afford private attorneys. The Removal of Demetrius Fannick as Cuadra’s lawyer was simply a CONTINUATION of a PATTERN OF CONDUCT designed to prevent Cuadra and Kerekes from mounting expert defenses.

All of the shit swirling around The Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, and you have This One Delusional Judge Olszewski who is some how convinced that the world will see him as this Respected Intelligent Jurist. It ain’t gonna happen. The best attack on the integrity of Judge Olszewski came when Judge Michael Conahan attacked Judge Ann Lokuta by saying to Lokuta: “You’re not one of us”. Clearly, Judge Michael Conahan considered/considers Judge Olszewki as one of the good ole boys of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas.

The Case Against Judge Olszewski

1. Judge Olszewski’s decision to remove Demetrius Fannick should first and most importantly be viewed in relation to the fact that Harlow Cuadra was assigned Bryan Kocis’ Lawyer by Judge Ciavarella BEFORE Olszewski took the “high and mighty road” of removing Fannick. Any legal argument for the removal of Fannick supports the dismissal of all charges against Cuadra BECAUSE Cuadra was assigned Kocis’ Lawyer. Any CONFLICT that COULD have resulted from Fannick representing Cuadra clearly DID result from Bryan Kocis’ lawyer (Al Flora, Jr.) representing Cuadra.

2. Olszewski had to redefine the standard for an implied attorney/client relationship in Pennsylvania in order to claim that Fannick established an attorney/client relationship with Joseph Kerekes.

3. The orders of Federal Judge Lewis Kaplan and The Second Circuit Court of Appeals support the argument that Olszewski FAILED to place Cuadra’s constitutional right to choice of counsel OVER some nebulous claims of “conflict of interest” (particularly when Cuadra and Kerekes were prepared to waive any conflicts associated with Fannick representing Cuadra). Judge Lewis Kaplan held that the court was required to remove a lawyer from representing Defendant A when the lawyer had previously represented Defendant B only because Defendant A REFUSED to waive any conflict of interest issues.

No Fucking Body is Going to Place Backwater Olszewski Above The Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Actually, it would not surprise us if Olszewski actually THINKS his legal positions will be given more weight than those of The Second Circuit Court of Appeals.