Setting Up Sean Lockhart for Fraud

February 28, 2009 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

<center>IPB Image </center>
Sean Lockhart has also been notified by Cobra Video’s legal counsel that he must appear in Luzerne County [Pennsylvania] on December 6, 2005 to submit to an oral deposition under oath regarding matters relating to his entry into a modeling contract with Cobra Video, the fulfillment or non-fulfillment of the terms of that contract, whether or not Lockhart fraudulently induced Cobra Video to enter into modeling contracts for the purposes of obtaining trade secrets of Cobra Video and whether or not Lockhart conspired with John Doe to engage in such fraud.” AVN.com

The statement above is from Bryan Kocis‘ old THREAT to have Sean Lockhart arrested in Luzerne County for Fraud because, inter alia, Lockhart lied to Kocis about being 18 years old. It turned out that while Kocis issued a press release about this lawsuit, no lawsuit was in fact filed. Sean Lockhart did not go to Luzerne County for the alleged deposition.

Sean Lockhart aka Brent Corrigan went to Luzerne County under the impression that he would be testifying to help Prosecutor’s case against Harlow Cuadra. However, it looks like Luzerne County was more interested in setting Lockhart up for Lockhart to be charged with defrauding Bryan Kocis / Cobra Video.

While testifying at The Bryan Kocis Murder Trial on February 27, 2009, Judge Peter Olszewski advised Sean Lockhart that Lockhart might be incriminating himself when Lockhart responded to a question from Prosecutors about Lockhart falsifying identification documents relating to him being underage so that Lockhart could “contract” with Bryan Kocis / Cobra Video to do gay videos.

It must be asked: “Why would PROSECUTORs ask THEIR witness a potentially self-incriminating question?” Prosecutors making Sean Lockhart look like a chronic liar to the jury can only help the Defense.

Lockhart said he was “17″ years old when he did “two shoots that were spread onto four DVDs,” adding that his first film was for Cobra Video, operated by Bryan Kocis, 44.
Luzerne County Judge Peter Paul Olszewski Jr. excused the jury to inquire if Sean Lockhart wanted a lawyer after Lockhart made “potentially incriminating” statements that he worked in adult films as a minor. Lockhart was answering questions from Assistant District Attorney Michael Melnick about his background in adult films when Olszewski stopped the proceeding and excused the jury from the courtroom.
Timesleader

Since Lockhart was 17 years old when he allegedly falsified identification documents so that he could do gay videos for Cobra Video, if Lockhart is charged with defrauding Bryan Kocis / Cobra Video, it seems to us Lockhart would have to be charged as a Juvenile in Luzerne County Juvenile Court.

[attachmentid=3252]

Open Letter to US Atttorney Martin C Carlson

February 24, 2009 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

To: US Attorney Martin C Carlson

I contribute to a blog that has been following the Corruption
Scandals in Luzerne County and The Bryan Kocis Murder
Investigation and Trial.

I am contacting you because I am very concerned that The Luzerne County DA has not recused itself from The Bryan Kocis Murder investigation and trial.

While I am not an attorney, I believe that the US Attorney’s
Office and any lawyer admitted to the bar would agree that The
Luzerne County DA’s past involvement with the 2006
“correction” to murder victim Bryan Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea
necessitates that The Luzerne County DA recuse itself from the
Bryan Kocis Murder Trial.

Specifically, Bryan Kocis plead guilty to a child molestation
charge in Luzerne County in 2002. Kocis’ originally recorded
guilty plea required that Kocis register as a sex offender under
PA’s Megans Law. In 2006, Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea was
“corrected”� by Judge Michael Conahan, The Luzerne County DA
and Defense Attorney Al Flora, Jr. in such a way that Kocis was
then not required to register as a sex offender under PA Megans
Law. Conahan and the DA’s Office claimed in 2006 that Kocis’
originally recorded guilty plea was a clerical error.

As I understand PA Law, it is a third degree felony to
circumvent Megans Law.

The US Attorney’s Office can easily verify that The Luzerne
County DA was in fact a party to the 2006 “correction”� to
Bryan Kocis 2002 guilty Plea along with then President Judge
Michael Conahan.

An argument can be made that, prior to his death, Bryan Kocis
was in a position to testify against Michael Conahan in a
criminal probe into how Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea could have
been completely changed four years later in 2006.

Thank you for your time and I want to Thank the US Attorney’s
Office for acting to protect the civil rights of juveniles in
Luzerne County.

Sean Lockhart Grant Roy and A New Prosecutor

February 24, 2009 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

<center>IPB Image </center>
We are seriously considering writing a certified letter to the US Attorney (with a copy to The Luzerne County DA) pointing out that Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea was corrected four years later in 2006 by Judge Michael Conahan, The Luzerne County DA and Kocis’ Lawyer Al Flora, Jr. As previously indicated,

Based on The Luzerne County DAs participation in the 2006 “correction” to Bryan Kocis’ 2006 guilty plea, no legal arguments can be made to justify the fact that The Luzerne County DA has NOT recused itself from The Bryan Kocis Murder Investigation / Trial.

Now, here is the $64,000 question …

If The Luzerne County DA DOES eventually recuse itself from The Bryan Kocis Murder Trial and A NEW DA is Appointed, Will That New DA Charge Sean Lockhart and Grant Roy in addition to Harlow Cuadra and Jospeh Kerekes with the Murder of Bryan Kocis?

From where we sit, Sean Lockhart and Grant Roy have dug a rather large hole for themselves in that While they were arguing in court that fuck contracts are void an unenforceable, they seemed to still be actively claiming to third parties that Lockhart was CONTRACTUALLY BOUND to Bryan Kocis and Cobra Video.

The Settlement of That Federal Lawsuit in San Diego between Lockhart and Kocis is highly suspect in that, ( a ) any idiot sued by Kocis would have moved to dismiss Kocis’ lawsuit; and ( b ) Kocis’ lawsuit was filed in the name of an apparent shell company out of Delaware.

[attachmentid=3230]

Bryan Kocis Murder Trial Begins

February 24, 2009 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

Harlow Cuadra </center>
We are disappointed that The Defense did not raise the issue of The Luzerne County DA’s past Involvement with Bryan Kocis in the Defense’s Opening Statement. However, the ISSUE can clearly be raised by The Defense at any time in the trial.

Who the fuck would believe that a Prosecutor that could in theory have had a motive to want the victim dead would have the fucking balls to LEAD the prosecution of someone accused of a crime? Clearly, anything is possible in Fucking Luzerne County Pennsylvania.

“Our defense is simple, Harlow didn’t do it,” D’Andrea said.

D’Andrea said Kocis and Lockhart, a contract model for Cobra Video, was engaged in a relationship that turned sour. Lockhart began a relationship with Roy, and the relationship with Kocis became “hostile,” D’Andrea said.

“You’ll hear testimony that Grant Roy and Sean Lockhart hated Bryan Kocis, they even wanted him dead,” D’Andrea said. Timesleader

Pendulum Swings to Dumbass Jackie Musto Carroll & Co

February 22, 2009 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

<center>IPB Image <br> Luzerne County’s DA Ghidorah <br> Former DAs Peter Olszewski and David Lupas and Current DA Jackie Musto-Carroll</center>
District Attorney Jackie Musto Carroll said the prosecutors who appeared in Ciavarella’s court shouldn’t be faulted for not questioning the large number of juveniles who appeared without lawyers.

“When the case comes into the courtroom and the juvenile doesn’t have a lawyer, the district attorneys know they went through a process where they waived their right to representation three times. It’s perfectly legal for someone to waive their right to an attorney,” Musto Carroll said.

“Let’s not forget there are kids who deserve to be in placement because they committed some serious crimes … There are kids who have to be there for their own sake and society’s sake,” Dumbass Jackie Musto Carroll quoted by Citizensvoice

<center>IPB Image <br> The Star Chamber</center>
The Missing Colloquy – WHY The Luzerne County DA’s Office IS Going Down

This is not rocket science …

1. Juvenile Court Judges in Pennsylvania were REQUIRED to recite a Colloquy on the record of juvenile cases informing the Juveniles that they had a right to legal counsel.

2. Judge Ciavarella did NOT recite the required Colloquy and has admitted to NOT reciting the colloguy.

3. As an Officer of the Court, The Luzerne County DA was required to step up and demand that Ciavarella recite the Colloquy on right to legal counsel on the record to Juvenile Defendants as required by Pennsylvania Law.

4. The Luzerne County DA’s Office: ( a ) did not step up and demand that Ciavarella comply with PA Law in re reciting the required colloquy; ( b ) the Luzerne County DA admits to being present when the Colloquy SHOULD have been recited and was not recited.

GAME OVER!

Again, this is not fucking rocket science …

You can’t only fault A Judge for violating Pennsylvania State Law on the reciting of A Required Colloquy on Right to Counsel when The Luzerne County DA – a fucking Officer of the Court – was in the fucking room and did nothing.

McCabe and Sanguedolce said the lack of a colloquy didn’t make much of an impression on them. Sanguedolce said he believed written waivers the juveniles signed earlier in the process were being entered into the record to satisfy the requirement for a colloquy.

“I can’t recall anyone ever asking for a lawyer and not getting one,” Sanguedolce said.

“I don’t think anyone ever made an issue of it,” McCabe said. “It’s for the defense. That’s not something for us, to do the colloquy.”

Russin said the question of the colloquy seems significant only in “hindsight.” Citizensvoice

Luzerne County DA Sanguedolce is dead wrong if he thinks the attorneys in The Luzerne County DA’s Office can get away with claiming that THE DEFENSE (not the prosecutors) was required to step up and demand that the required Colloquy be read. EVERY LAWYER ADMITTED TO THE BAR IS CONSIDERED AN OFFICER OF THE COURT AND OFFICERS OF THE COURT ARE REQUIRED TO ACT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND CERTAINLY TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW. There is simply no way around the fact that as Officers of the Court, The Attorneys in the Luzerne County DA’s Office WERE REQUIRED to step up and demand that Civarella recite The Required Colloquy on Right to Counsel to Juvenile Defendants.

The Luzerne County DA, FRAUD ON THE COURT and RICO

When Officers of The Court like the attorneys in The Luzerne County DA’s Office fail to act in the interest of justice as required of ALL Officers of the Court, I’m pretty sure that falls into the category of A Fraud On The Court. And,

With 500+ juveniles not receiving the required colloquy on right to counsel from Judge Ciavarella, I think what we have here is A pattern of Fraud.

A Pattern of Fraud is the Basic Requirement for A Criminal RICO Charge.

Dumbass Jackie Musto Carroll & Co and The Luzerne County DAs before Carroll (Lupas and Olszewski) are GOING DOWN With Conahan and Ciavarella.

The legal system in America is adversarial and has THREE COMPONENTS: ( 1 ) the Judge; ( 2 ) the prosecution; and, ( 3 ) the defense. In addition, as cited, ALL LAWYERS ADMITTED TO THE BAR ARE OFFICERS OF THE COURT and required to act in the interest of Justice.

[attachmentid=3220] [attachmentid=3224]

WSJ Article and Bryan Kocis Idiot Federal Lawsuit

February 21, 2009 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

<center>IPB Image </center>
We have said all along that The Most Suspect Thing of All in The Bryan Kocis Murder Scandal is The Settlement Agreement between Cobra Video and Sean Lockhart et. al. Why would Sean Lockhart settle a lawsuit filed against him in Federal Court by A Child Molester / Gay Pornographer who was seeking to enforce a fuck contract? It just boggles the fucking mind that Luzerne County Prosecutors are so fucking stupid that they can’t see just how suspect That Settlement Agreement between Cobra Video and Sean Lockhart et al really is.

Some YEARS AGO, we pointed that when you are sued by an unattractive litigant in Federal Court, the easiest way to find out of The Federal Judge hates the guy who is suing you is to file a motion to dismiss. We went on to say that it is standard practice in Federal Court in Racial Discrimination Lawsuits for the defendant employer to file a motion to dismiss because, employers all over America KNOW that Federal Judges Hate Blacks and Racial Discrimination lawsuits. Well,

An article in The Wall Street Journal is citing a study that CONFIRMS that racial discrimination lawsuits in federal court ARE being immediately dismissed on motions to dismiss from employers by Federal Judges.

Equally troubling to critics, though, is that federal judges also now routinely terminate employment-discrimination cases through motions to dismiss, meaning that the plaintiffs aren’t allowed to conduct fact finding to support their claims, according to a law-review study due to be published in August by the University of Illinois College of Law.

The study analyzed the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2007 ruling in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, which authorized federal judges to dismiss cases unless plaintiffs can detail enough facts in their initial complaints to state a “plausible” claim — a higher standard than previously existed. Although the Twombly case involved an antitrust dispute, it has since been applied broadly to discrimination cases, says Joseph Seiner, a professor at the University of South Carolina School of Law, who wrote the study. WSJ

Bryan Kocis’ Idiot Lawsuit in Federal Court

1. It goes a long way in showing just how fucking delusional Bryan Kocis had become that this piece of shit child molester / gay pornographer didn’t think twice about suing someone in Federal Court. Bryan Kocis had clearly gotten so used to having judges in his pocket, he obviously assumed that ALL judges were like those little Corrupt Judges in Luzerne County. It is fucking INSANE that an unattractive litigant like Bryan Kocis had the fucking balls to sue anyone in Federal Court for any reason.

2. The only thing more INSANE and more OUTRAGEOUS than Child Molester / Gay Pornographer Bryan Kocis walking into Federal Court and suing Sean Lockhart et. al. to enforce a fuck contract is the outrageous fact that Sean Lockhart et al not only DID NOT respond to the lawsuit with a motion to dismissed, they actually settled the lawsuit. Listen, let me just say AGAIN what any lawyer who has ever been in Federal Court will confirm …

If you are sued in Federal Court by Child Molester / Gay Pornographer Bryan Kocis seeking to enforce a Fuck Contract AND YOU DON’T RESPOND WITH A MOTION TO DISMISS, you either ( a ) have the worst fucking legal adviser in the history of the fucking known universe; or ( b ) you had OTHER MOTIVES for wanting a Settlement Agreement with a Guy Who Would Soon be DECAPITATED.

[attachmentid=3222]

Jarratt Moody Say What Again

February 20, 2009 in Bryan Kocis Murder by Harlow-Cuadra-Forum


Intonation
Uploaded by sabotage. – Discover more animation and arts videos.

The commericals that aired for the Grammy Awards used text displayed on the screen in a way that reminded me of Jarrot Moody‘s “Say What Again” video (see above).

We actually used the “Say What Again” clip in a fake interview with Harlow Cuadra. Harlow had the fake interview on his website and we have the interview here (CLICK HERE)

The “audio” used in the “Say What Again” video is obviously from Pulp Fiction. Samuel Jackson is doing much of the speaking.

Tainted Law of Michael Conahan and Mark Ciavarella

February 19, 2009 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

Everybody’s doing it … Doing It Doing it?

A lot of people and businesses in Luzerne County are going back to Court arguing that Court Decisions and Judgments from Disgraced Judges Michael Conahan and Mark Ciavarella should be overturned because the Judges have pleaded guilty to accepting kickbacks.

1. Adult criminal defendants are arguing that it was wrong to use their Juvenile Records in their sentencings because the Juvenile Convictions are Tainted by Conahan and Civarella.

2. The Citizens Voices is arguing that a $3.5 million judgment against it is tainted becuase Judges Conahan and Civarella had connections to a convicted mobster associated with the defamation suit. Conahan as president Judge assigned the defamation lawsuit to Ciavarella.

Judge Mark Ciavarella not only assembled The Pool of Conflict Counsels without advertising the positions, Civarella assigned his current attorney Al Flora, Jr to represent Harlow Cuadra. It is only a matter of time before criminal defendants represented by Mark Ciavarella’s Pool of Conflict Counsels petition The Supreme Court to have all of their convictions and guilty pleas overturned.

AND YET, inspite of all of the above, Dumbass Jackie Musto Carroll proceeds to trial against Harlow Cuadra when Cuadra was 99.9% of the time represented by Ciavarella’s Conflict Counsels.

Sharkey Scam Links Musto-Carroll Lupas and Olszewski

February 19, 2009 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

<center>IPB Image <br> Luzerne County’s DA Ghidorah <br>Peter Olszewski, David Lupas, Jackie Musto-Carroll</center>
[i]The special county fund looted by Luzerne County Court Administrator William T. Sharkey Sr. over the last 10 years has never been audited and its expenditures are kept secret, county officials said Tuesday.
Citizensvoice

Here’s the gist of it

Monies seized by Luzerne County Criminal Investigators in gambling cases were deposited into a SPECIAL FUND ACCOUNT. The Luzerne County DA’s Office and Court Administrator William T. Sharkey both received notice of monies seized and deposited to the special fund account. Sharkey’s scam unraveled when law enforcement officers requested money from The Special Fund to buy equipment and there was no money in the Fund. Now,

William T Sharkey has plead guilty to stealing money from the special fund account over the last ten years.

The fact that Sharkey’s Scam was ongoing over THE LAST TEN YEARs becomes very interesting because The Following People were Luzerne County DAs over the last ten years WHILE Sharkey was stealing money from the Special Fund Account (when both Sharkey and the DA were getting notice of monies deposited to the special fund account):

1. Current Bryan Kocis Murder Trial Judge Peter Olszewski was the Luzerne County DAs for two years of the ten years that Sharkey was stealing money from the fund.
2. Former DA and current Judge David Lupas was Luzerne County DA until last year. And,
3. Current Luzerne County DA Jackie Musto Carroll became DA in January of 2008.

So, since Sharkey was stealing money from the Special Fund Account AND the Luzerne County DA was getting notice of money deposited to the Special Fund Account, how is it that Peter Olszewski and David Lupas never noticed that money was missing from the special fund account? In addition,

Sharkey Needed Orders from Luzerne County Judges to Get Money Out of the Special Fund Account

t’s unclear how Sharkey managed to gain control of the gambling proceeds from the Liquor Control Board cases. At some point, letters from the state police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement asking the district attorney to obtain a court order to take control of forfeited money in administrative cases began being forwarded to Sharkey also.

“Our office would get a copy. His office would get a copy and he would take it from there,” Musto Carroll said.

Sharkey obtained the court orders from unwitting judges, but never filed them and pocketed the money, prosecutors say. Citizens Voice

Unwitting Judges?

So, UNWITTING LUZERNE COUNTY JUDGEs gave Sharkey court orders that allowed Sharkey to steal money from a special fund account over a ten year period?

Either The Remaining Judges on The Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas are the dumbest fucking Judges in America OR, they knew that Conahan, Ciavarella and Sharkey were crooks.

[attachmentid=3223]

How Fahking Stupid is Jackie Musto Carroll Part III

February 18, 2009 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

When Bryan Kocis turned up Headless and on Fire in 2007, An Experienced Un-Biased Criminal Investigator would probably have FIRST asked Michael Conahan and The Attorneys in The Luzerne County DA’s Office where they were the night Kocis was killed. AND YET, Luzerne County DA Jackie Musto Carroll not only DID NOT recuse the DA’s Office from The Bryan Kocis Murder INVESTIGATION, Musto Carroll is leading the criminal prosecution of Harlow Cuadra for Bryan Kocis’ Murder. Seriously, can anybody with a law degree actually be this fucking stupid?

I think the Luzerne County DA’s Office is bluffing about going forward with a murder trial for Harlow Cuadra.

I can’t believe that even those fucking idiots in The Luzerne County DA’s Office (Idiots who apparently could NOT see that Conahan and Ciavarella were crooks) are stupid enough to actually go ahead with prosecuting Harlow Cuadra for the Murder of Bryan Kocis when The DA’s Office it can be argued had a motive to want Bryan Kocis dead.

It is a third degree felony to circumvent the requirements of Megans Law in PA. And, as a result of the 2006 “correction” to Bryan Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea, Kocis did not register as a Sex Offender under Megans Law. Clearly, AN ALTERNATE THEORY OF THE CRIME could be that Bryan Kocis was killed to prevent Kocis from testifying in a federal probe into how Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea was corrected in 2006. The Parties to “correcting” Bryan Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea in 2006 were Michael Conahan, The Luzerne County DA’s Office and Defense Attorney Al Flora, Jr. Call me a dumb beauch with no vagina butt, it seems to be that WANTING TO AVOID A FELONY CONVICTION is a better motive for murder than wanting to make fuck videos with Sean Lockhart.