<center> <br> Luzerne County’s DA Ghidorah <br> Former DAs Peter Olszewski and David Lupas and Current DA Jackie Musto-Carroll</center>
District Attorney Jackie Musto Carroll said the prosecutors who appeared in Ciavarella’s court shouldn’t be faulted for not questioning the large number of juveniles who appeared without lawyers.

“Let’s not forget there are kids who deserve to be in placement because they committed some serious crimes … There are kids who have to be there for their own sake and society’s sake,” Dumbass Jackie Musto Carroll quoted by Citizensvoice

<center> <br> The Star Chamber</center>
The Missing Colloquy – WHY The Luzerne County DA’s Office IS Going Down

This is not rocket science …

1. Juvenile Court Judges in Pennsylvania were REQUIRED to recite a Colloquy on the record of juvenile cases informing the Juveniles that they had a right to legal counsel.

2. Judge Ciavarella did NOT recite the required Colloquy and has admitted to NOT reciting the colloguy.

3. As an Officer of the Court, The Luzerne County DA was required to step up and demand that Ciavarella recite the Colloquy on right to legal counsel on the record to Juvenile Defendants as required by Pennsylvania Law.

4. The Luzerne County DA’s Office: ( a ) did not step up and demand that Ciavarella comply with PA Law in re reciting the required colloquy; ( b ) the Luzerne County DA admits to being present when the Colloquy SHOULD have been recited and was not recited.

GAME OVER!

Again, this is not fucking rocket science …

You can’t only fault A Judge for violating Pennsylvania State Law on the reciting of A Required Colloquy on Right to Counsel when The Luzerne County DA – a fucking Officer of the Court – was in the fucking room and did nothing.

McCabe and Sanguedolce said the lack of a colloquy didn’t make much of an impression on them. Sanguedolce said he believed written waivers the juveniles signed earlier in the process were being entered into the record to satisfy the requirement for a colloquy.

Russin said the question of the colloquy seems significant only in “hindsight.” Citizensvoice

Luzerne County DA Sanguedolce is dead wrong if he thinks the attorneys in The Luzerne County DA’s Office can get away with claiming that THE DEFENSE (not the prosecutors) was required to step up and demand that the required Colloquy be read. EVERY LAWYER ADMITTED TO THE BAR IS CONSIDERED AN OFFICER OF THE COURT AND OFFICERS OF THE COURT ARE REQUIRED TO ACT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND CERTAINLY TO COMPLY WITH THE LAW. There is simply no way around the fact that as Officers of the Court, The Attorneys in the Luzerne County DA’s Office WERE REQUIRED to step up and demand that Civarella recite The Required Colloquy on Right to Counsel to Juvenile Defendants.

The Luzerne County DA, FRAUD ON THE COURT and RICO

When Officers of The Court like the attorneys in The Luzerne County DA’s Office fail to act in the interest of justice as required of ALL Officers of the Court, I’m pretty sure that falls into the category of A Fraud On The Court. And,

With 500+ juveniles not receiving the required colloquy on right to counsel from Judge Ciavarella, I think what we have here is A pattern of Fraud.

A Pattern of Fraud is the Basic Requirement for A Criminal RICO Charge.

Dumbass Jackie Musto Carroll & Co and The Luzerne County DAs before Carroll (Lupas and Olszewski) are GOING DOWN With Conahan and Ciavarella.

The legal system in America is adversarial and has THREE COMPONENTS: ( 1 ) the Judge; ( 2 ) the prosecution; and, ( 3 ) the defense. In addition, as cited, ALL LAWYERS ADMITTED TO THE BAR ARE OFFICERS OF THE COURT and required to act in the interest of Justice.

[attachmentid=3220] [attachmentid=3224]