“Harlow Cuadra Mistakenly convinced” makes its debut

November 30, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

Luzerne County Prosecutors claim that Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes considered Bryan Kocis’ Cobra Video company their biggest competitor. Cuadra and Kerekes wanted to work with Cobra’s biggest star Sean Lockhart when Lockhart was contractually bound to Cobra Video.

As we pointed out previously here, an attorney admitted to the bar, an officer of the court, can’t even go before a judge and claim that Sean Lockhart was contractually bound to Cobra Video. Okay, any shit might technically be possible in Luzerne County Courts but, a licensed attorney and officer of the court can’t go before a legit court and argue that Sean Lockhart was contractually bound to Cobra Video. Because this IS so, we stated that Luzerne County Prosecutors would HAVE to amend their motive mantra to claim that Cuadra and Kerekes were mistakenly convinced that Lockhart was contractually bound to Cobra Video.

Well, it appears that Harlow Cuadra mistakenly convinced has made its debut on Sean Lockhart’s BrentCorriganInc.com Blog

While there was initial interest in collaborative film work between Brent Corrigan and Harlow Cuadra, BoyBatter’s misunderstanding of the circumstances (namely our settlement with Cobra Video) at hand made it unlikely. Then the unthinkable occurred and the mere prospect of a collaborative effort became utterly impossible, and certainly unattractive to Brent Corrigan INC. We were not EVER costars. Brent Corrgian Inc (adult site)

In this referenced blog entry, Sean Lockhart / Brent Corrigan finally responds to the Rolling Stone Article and the Out Magazine Article on The Bryan Kocis Murder. Lockhart believes that Peter Wilkinson was “selective” in what he decided to leave out of the article he wrote for Rolling Stone.

We had an email exchange with a friend of Timothy Boham about an article Out Magazine has prepared on Boham and the murder of J.P. Kelso. After a number of email exhanges on the subject, I finally had to ask Timothy’s friend what the hell lead her to believe that something like Out Magazine would be sympathetic towards Timothy Boham?

I received a voice mail message from some guy who left his name and asked me to call him. The Guy gave no explanation of what he was or what he wanted. When I searched the guy’s name on the net, I found out he was a writer for The Village Voice. Why the fuck would I talk to some fucking writer for the fucking Village Voice? I would point out that I received this little voice mail right around the time that I had written a blog entry about Has Been Michael Musto

The Literal Threat of a Bryan Kocis Murder Trial

November 28, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

How is the fact that Joseph Kerekes is “considering” hiring a private lawyer to represent him NEWS?

There is a news report in The Citizens Voice out of Luzerne County today that Joseph Kerekes is considering hiring the attorney Demetrius Fannick, a very high profile Defense Attorney in Luzerne County.

How is this news?

The Threats Are Flying in The Bryan Kocis Murder Scandal

From where we sit, press (or a “press release”) that Joseph Kerekes is “considering” hiring a high profile Defense Attorney is simply a Counter Threat to The Luzerne County DA’s threat that it would try to introduce evidence of Other Criminal Conduct at a murder trial for Joseph Kerekes.

If Kerekes had actually hired attorney Demetrius Fannick, That would be news. A Report that Kerekes is “considering” hiring Demetrius Fannick is NOT news, it’s gamesmanship, it’s propaganda …

Not that that is a bad thing … We think it is great that Joseph Kerekes apparently has a “Competent PR Machine” in his camp. The more press on The Bryan Kocis Murder Scandal the better.

Attorney Demetrius Fannick has been contacted by accused killer Joseph Kerekes about representing him during his upcoming trial. Citizens Voice

The NON NEWS of Joe possibly hiring a private Defense Attorney simply further drives home THE FACT that The Threat of A Bryan Kocis Murder Trial in Luzerne County is just that, A THREAT.

At this point, it is difficult to say who would be harmed more by a Bryan Kocis Murder Trial, Luzerne County or The Accuseds (i.e., Joseph Kerekes and Harlow Cuadra).

Of What Possible Value is Being The Smarter Lawyer in Luzerne County?

Seriously, of what possible value could being a brilliant lawyer be in Luzerne County? Is there any evidence that brilliant legal arguments mean anything before Luzerne County Courts?

We’re not lawyers here on The Bitchless Blog and we pretty much wiped out The Luzerne County DA’s motive for the murder of Bryan Kocis. Apparently, somebody in the DA’s Office didn’t know that Adult Entertainment Performance Contracts were void and unenforceable (and that Sean Lockhart had filed actual legal pleadings in federal court in San Diego in which he argued that his contract with Cobra Video was void and “against public policy”).

The Attorney Demetrius Fannick has apparently forced The Luzerne County DA to spend far more time and money than it intended to prosecuting the current Weakly Case. And, the piviotal SIMILARITY of Weakly to Kerekes is that Fannick could probably guarantee that Kerekes will have a separate trial from Cuadra as a result of The Blacks Beach Tapes, as Fannick managed to get separate trials for Weakly and Selensky (sp?).

All any good lawyer could probably hope to accomplish for a defendant in Luzerne County is generate a lot of press and create a lot of delay.. The very fact that both newspapers in Luzerne County are carrying the NON NEWS that Kerekes is “thinking about” hiring Fannick suggests that Fannick is in fact great at creating a lot of press.

Question. If a Judge can assign the victim’s lawyers to represent the Accused with a straight face, is it even theoretically possibly to embarass that Judge with Bad Press?

Public Defender Needed Waiver from Harlow Cuadra

November 27, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

The Prosecution of Harlow Cuadra is O.V.E.R. All that is left to do in the prosecution of Harlow Cuadra for the murder of Bryan Kocis is for someone to put out the flames of what was The State’s Case Against Harlow Cuadra.

Technically, there would be no CRISIS in the prosecution of Harlow Cuadra had Cuadra WAIVED his Right to Conflict Free Representation.

And, wouldn’t you know that it was that nympho Peter Everhard who posted a message on Harlow Cuadra’s Blog advising Cuadra to write a letter to the judge in his case specifically stating that he, Cuadra, DID NOT waive his right to conflict free representation (per a decision of Federal Judge Kaplan in New York in the infamous criminal tax case against former KPMG employees)?

THE GOSSIP ON THE NET is that Attorneys for The Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office met with Harlow Cuadra only once (for about 30 miniutes) after the order of President Judge Mark Ciavarella refusing to disqualify the Public Defenders as Harlow Cuadra’s counsel. We’re guessing that The Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office MUST have gone to Harlow Cuadra and asked Cuadra to waive his right to conflict free representation. The only way we know of that the LICENSED ATTORNEYS and OFFICERS OF THE COURT in the Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office could have even made an attempt to represent Harlow Cuadra (the man accused of killing their former client) would have been if The Attorneys obtained a SIGNED AND NOTORIZED WAIVER from Harlow Cuadra allowing the Public Defenders to act as his counsel.

It is even doubtful that a waiver from Cuadra would have been considered legally binding if Cuadra did not have the advise of Conflict Free Counsel when he signed the waiver. So, in order to legally waive his right to conflict free counsel, Cuadra would have had to have had the advise of conflict free counsel to make the waiver valid. It’s like a Catcha 22.

Once Harlow Cuadra Refused to Waive His Right to Conflict Free Representation

GAME OVER!

Once Harlow Cuadra would have refused to waive his right to conflict free representation, there would have been no way for the Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office to do anything whatsoever in relation to defending Harlow Cuadra without risking: ( a ) disbarrment; ( b ) possible criminal actions against them; and ( c ) a guarranteed reversal by the court of appeals of any subsequent conviction of Harlow Cuadra.

Without a Waiver from Harlow Cuadra, The Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office would have then had to advice The Judge(s) in Harlow Cuadra’s case and The Luzerne County District Attorney’s Office that They (The Public Defenders) were not able to and “WERE NOT GOING TO” Represent Harlow Cuadra. No matter what Judge Ciavarella ordered.

ONE MUST ASSUME that The Luzerne County DA’s Office moved to disqualify The Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office as counsel for Cuadra after The DA’s office would have been advised by the Public Defender that they would take no actions in relation to representing Cuadra OR if the DA’s Office became aware that The Public Defenders were not proceeding in any way with Defending Cuadra.

Case Against Joseph Kerekes Also Evaporating

November 26, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

THIS IS A BOMBSHELL EVENT! Defense Attorneys AND Prosecuting Attorneys in the Bryan Kocis Murder Trial have taken a very public stance AGAINST an order issued by The President Judge of Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas.

The Prosecution of Harlow Cuadra is Dead on Arrival.

Unless President Judge Mark Ciavarella again steps in to decide motions in prosecution of Harlow Cuadra, the prosecution of Harlow Cuadra CAN’T be saved.

As we indicated earlier, New Attorneys for Harlow Cuadra are almost ethically REQUIRED to move for dismissal of all charges against Harlow Cuadra as a result of Cuadra being denied his right to Conflict Free Counsel. And, since the Luzerne County DA is concurrently arguing that there was in fact a conflict created by The Luzerne County Public Defender representing Harlow Cuadra, where is the dispute?

There is no apparent dispute that Harlow Cuadra was in fact denied his right to conflict free representation (in a fucking death penalty murder trial) as a result of the decision of Present Judge Mark A Ciavarella to assign Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers to represent Harlow Cuadra.

The Case Against Joseph Kerekes Evaporates

All of the IP Addresses and Email Accounts referenced by investigators in the Bryan Kocis Murder Investigation belonged to Harlow Cuadra, not Joseph Kerekes. So, technically, there is no IP ADDRESS EVIDENCE nor EMAIL EVIDENCE against Joseph Kerekes for the murder of Bryan Kocis.

Also, since Harlow Cuadra is alleged by Prosecutors to have incriminated Joseph Kerekes on The Blacks Beach Tapes, Prosecutors would only be able to introduce “The Blacks Beach Tapes” into evidence in a trial against Jopseh Kerekes IF Harlow Cuadra testifies against Joseph Kerekes, because Jospeh Kerekes has a right to cross-examine any witnesses against him at trial.

What exactly are the chances that a freed Harlow Cuadra is voluntarily going to testify against his lover of six years to help Prosecutors who were determined to stick a needle in Cuadra’s arm?

Say goodbye to those Blacks Beach Tapes. The Blacks Beach Tapes all along stood little chance of ever being introduced into evidence because doing would would have result in separate trials for Cuadra and Kerekes. Attorney Barry Taylor said from the git go that there would be problems with The Blacks Beach Tapes.

Yes, Kerekes claims that he was at a motel in Luzerne County but, there is no proof that Bryan Kocis wasn’t already dead long before the time Kerekes is alleged to have been in Luzerne County.

All of the statements reported so far from the Coroner who did the autopsy on Bryan Kocis point to an unknown time of death. The public statement of the Coroner in the Bryan Kocis Murder Investigation is that HE (the coroner) doesn’t know when Bryan Kocis was killed.

The Appearance of Bias

The biggest argument for Musto-Carroll dropping all charges against Jospeh Kerekes (after she drops all charges against Harlow Cuadra) is the fact that the same Judge who assigned Bryan Kocis’ lawyers to represent Harlow Cuadra ALSO decided motions that affected Joseph Kerekes.

GAME OVER

Being a little bit BIASED is like being a little bit pregnant.

Jackie Musto-Carroll and Harlow Cuadra Part III

November 25, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

The Signs that there isn’t and never was any real evidence against Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes for the murder of Bryan Kocis have been obvious from the git go to anyone with a trained legal eye.

Using RICO to go after Hookers is the Legal Equivalent of a Keystone Cops Comedy. That the State of Virginia had no legal means to combat prostitution until the state created the Racketeering Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act is the legal joke of the century[/i].

You Don’t RICO Hookers if you have an iron-clad case for for convicting those hookers of murder. The only reason I can think for RICO-ing hookers is desperation. If you know you don’t have any evidence against those Hookers for your murder trial, and you want to prevent those hookers from being able to afford lawyers, THEN RICO-ing Hookers would make a logical “desperation move”.

And That Fucking Camera

There are men in orbit right now building an international space station and Luzerne County Pennsylvania knows of no way to determine if a camera in Harlow Cuadra’s possession once belonged to Bryan Kocis. Is this some kind of fucking joke?

Jackie Musto-Carroll and Anne Lokuta

Jackie Musto-Carroll has been employed with the Luzerne County District Attorney’s Office for a number of years. However, Jackie Musto-Carroll is now The First Female District Attorney for Luzerne County.

Only months before Jackie Musto-Carroll was elected the First Female District Attorney for Luzerne County, Musto-Carroll watched as The Good Ole Boys of Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas went after Judge Anne Lokuta, The Only Female Judge on The Court of Common Pleas.

Jackie Musto-Carroll KNOWS OR SHOULD KNOW what the Good Ole Boys of Luzerne County Court are Capable of Doing to Women they don’t like.

The same political blog in Luzerne County that claimed that President Judge Mark Ciavarella was hand picked by Judge Michael Conahan to become the new President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas claimed that it was in fact Judge Michael Conahan who instigated judicial misconduct proceedings against Judge Anne Lockuta. It appears that Conahan was President Judge when the complaints against Lokuta were made.

The move by The NEW Luzerne County District Attorneys Office DEMANDING outside counsel for Harlow Cuadra is Musto-Carroll’s BREAK from The Good Ole Boys, it has an impact that could be far more “wide reaching” than the murder trial of Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes.

Is Musto-Carroll hinting that she will launch a criminal investigation into the “CORRECTION” of Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea?

Let’s see, who was involved in the 2005 “correction” to Bryan Kocis 2002 guilty plea? Oh, it was Judge Michael Conahan and Attorney Al Flora, Jr.

Judge Anne Lokuta claimed that misconduct proceedings were initiated against her because he participated in a Federal Investigation of Luzerne County Court. Did the FEDs investigate the 2005 “correction” to Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea?

Again, IF someone did improperly help Bryan Kocis evade the requirements of Megan’s Law, that would constitute A Third Degree Felony.

Musto-Carroll WILL Drop Charges Against Harlow Cuadra

November 24, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

<center> [attachmentid=1990] <br>Take Your Fucking Severed Head And Go The Fuck Away!</center>
The Reality in the Prosecution of Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes is that President Judge Mark A Ciavarella assigned Bryan Kocis’s Lawyers to represent Harlow Cuadra in a death penalty murder trial.

The Newspapers in Luzerne County and The Luzerne County District Attorneys Office are dancing around the fact that Jonathan Blum and Al Flora, Jr. of the Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office are STILL Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers. Jonathan Blum and Al Flora, Jr. were not ONCE Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers, they are STILL Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers. Based on all available evidence, Al Flora, Jr. is still on retainer to Bryan Kocis’ Relatives. In addition,

A Lawyer has a CONTINUING OBLIGATION to act in the interests of his Client

I didn’t just make up the above statement. The above statement was made by The United States Attorney’s Office in New York AND, it was accepted by Federal Judge Kaplan. The United States Attorney’s Office AND a Federal Judge have both taken the position that an attorney has a CONTINUING obligation to act in the interests of his client. Jonathan Blum and Al Flora, Jr. are STILL Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers.

“A lawyer cannot attack his former client through cross-examination or argument to the jury” because of his or her “duty of continuing loyalty” to that former client, prosecutors said WSJ Law Blog See our prior post “Harlow Cuadra Right To Conflict Free Representation”

GAME OVER FOR FREAK SHOW MURDER TRIAL

EVEN I can see the END RESULT of this Strike Against The Good Ole Boy Network in Luzerne County by District Attorney Elect Jackie Musto-Carroll. A new attorney for Harlow Cuadra would be an idiot NOT TO MOVE FOR DISMISSAL of all charges against Cuadra due to the IRREPARABLE HARM done to Cuadra as a result of Cuadra being assigned Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers. AND,

1 + 1 Still Equals 2. Once Harlow Cuadra’s New Lawyers move for dismissal of all charges against Cuadra, Jackie Musto-Carroll will, by all available evidence, not oppose the motion.

Via its motion to Disquality the Public Defender’s Office for Cuadra, The Luzerne County DA’s Office has essentially CONCURRED that it was inappropriate for President Judge Mark Ciavarella to assign the Public Defender’s Office to represent Harlow Cuadra. So, How Can The Luzerne County DA’s Office oppose a motion for dismissal of all charges against Cuadra due to prejudice done to Cuadra that the DA itself acknowledges?

GAME OVER!

Kocis Conahan Flora and Ciavarella

November 23, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

In our post The Call That Killed Bryan Kocis we referred to a “rumored” call someone is alleged to have made to The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania circa 2005 disclosing to Megan Law Officials that Bryan Kocis was not a Registered Sex Offender as required by his 2002 guilty plea to “sexual abuse of children”. After the alledged call in 2005, Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea was subsequently “corrected” to show that Bryan Kocis’ guilty plea was to “corrupting a minor”, a plea that did not require that Kocis register as A Sex Offender.

When Bryan Kocis plead guilty to sexual abuse of children in 2001/2002 after being found with video tape of himself having sex with a 15 year old boy, Kocis was represented by the attorney Al Flora, Jr. and the Judge in the case was Judge Michael Conahan. At the time Judge Michael Conahan was President Judge of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas. According to a political blog in Luzerne County, Judge Mark Ciavarella was hand picked by Michael Conahan to become the new President Judge of Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas.

Flash Forward to January 2007.

Bryan Kocis’ headless flambeed corpse is found in his burning house and immediately The Community wants to know why Bryan Kocis wasn’t a Registered Sex Offender.

Press Release from Kocis’ Estate

In response to questions from The Community about WHY Kocis wasn’t a registered sex offender, Bryan Kocis’ Estate Re-Hired Attorney Al Flora, Jr and issued a press release claiming that Bryan Kocis wasn’t a pedophile. Flash Forward.

On a Sunday before the arrest of Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes, Judge Michael Conahan announces that he will retire at the end of the year 2007.

Bryan Kocis, Michael Conahan, Al Flora and Mark Ciavarella

Note: It just so happens that it is a third degree felony for anyone to aid someone in avoiding the requirements of “Megan’s Law” in The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Attorney Al Flora, Jr is the “second in command” for the Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office, and, Flora obviously knew that he was Bryan Kocis’ Lawyer in 2002 and four years later when he and Judge Conahan “corrected” Bryan Kocis’ guilty plea AND in 2007 when he was re-hired by Bryan Kocis’ Relatives. In addition,

Attorney Jonathan Blum of the Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office voluntarily disclosed that he too had represented Bryan Kocis. It was in fact Jonathan Blum who filed a motion requesting that The Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office be disqualified from Representing Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes.

While President Judge Mark Ciavarella assigns Joseph Kerekes outside/conflict counsel, Harlow Cuadra is assigned The Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office (Jonathan Blum and Al Flora) as his attorneys. Blum and Flora were Bryan Kocis’s lawyers. Based on available information, Al Flora is STILL the attorney for Bryan Kocis’ relatives and Bryan Kocis’ Estate. In addition, Jonathan Blum alleges that attorney Al Flora could be a witness for the State against Cuadra and Kerekes because Flora was interviewed by detectives pursuant to the investigation into the murder of Bryan Kocis.

Attorneys Jonathan Blum and Al Flora could be Witnesses for The State Against Harlow Cuadra WHILE also technically Being Harlow Cuadra’s Lawyer. Where else but in Luzerne County Could The Victim’s Lawyers be Representing The Accused?

Jackie Musto-Carroll and Harlow Cuadra Part II

November 22, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

I’m guessing that Jackie Musto-Carroll, the First Female District Attorney for Luzerne County, has bigger ambitions than dragging the decapitated corpse of Bryan Kocis behind her for the rest of her political life.

There are indications coming out of Luzerne County that District Attorney Elect Jackie Musto-Carroll is NOT going to be a Good Ole Boy.

The Luzerne County DA’s Office has apparently sided with The Luzerne County Public Defender on the position that it is inappropriate for The Luzerne County Public Defender to represent Harlow Cuadra.

Background on Harlow Cuadra Being Represented by Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers

A political blog out of Luzerne County alleged earlier in the year that Retiring Judge Michael Conahan (President Judge for Bryan Kocis 2002 Child Molestation Case) ruled Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas with an Iron Fist. The political blog also claimed that Luzerne County’s Current President Judge Mark A. Ciavarella was Judge Michael Conahan’s hand picked successor for the position of President Judge of Luzerne County of Common Pleas.

Judge Michael Conahan announced that he would retire from the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas at the end of the year, the announcement was made on the Sunday before the arrest of Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes.

While Judge Peter Olszewski was assigned as trial judge for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes, it was in fact President Judge Mark A. Ciavarella who over-ruled the request by The Luzerne County Public Defender that that OUTSIDE COUNSEL be assigned for Harlow Cuadra because there was a conflict of interest associated with the Luzerne County Public Defender’s Office representing Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes. Two attorneys in the PD’s Office (Jonathan Blum and Al Flora) represented Bryan Kocis.

Conviction by Any Means Available

Traditionally, a low income Prosecutor going no where will take a conviction anyway he/she can get it. “Win at any cost and leave it up to the convicted to try to dig their way out” seems to be the “mantra” for the typical Prosecutor who is really nothing more than a Clerk with a Law Degree. However,

As indicated above, I’m guessing that the First Female District Attorney for Luzerne County has bigger political ambitions than being the DA in Luzerne County for the rest of her life. Why should Jackie Musto-Carroll begin her political career by wrapping herself in old shit associated with Judge Michael Conahan’s legacy?. Why would Jackie Musto-Carroll start what could be her campaign to be Governor of Pennsylvania or United States Attorney General with Bryan Kocis’ Corpse on her back?

Nobody gives a shit who killed Bryan Kocis! and,

No Public Official in Luzerne County is going to avoid being TAINTED by Bryan Kocis if there is a FREAK SHOW TRIAL over who killed Kocis.

It appears that Luzerne County District Attorney’s Office is not going along with the order of President Judge Mark Ciavarella that it is okay for Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers to represent Harlow Cuadra.

Who would think that it would be okay for Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers to represent Harlow Cuadra?

Only a DA going nowhere who wanted to win at any cost would participate in any murder trial in which the accused was represented by the Victim’s Lawyers.

President Judge Mark Ciavarella was not the assigned trial judge for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes, so, why did he step into this case to assign Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers to represent Harlow Cuadra?

The Prosecution of Harlow Cuadra (and possibly Joseph Kerekes) is DOA. Both The Luzerne County Public Defender AND the Luzerne County District Attorney now appear to recognize that it is inappriate for Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers to Represent Harlow Cuadra (unless Cuadra specifically waives his right to “conflict free counsel”). And, time has been lost while Harlow Cuadra was essentially unrepresented because the Public Defender recognized that acting as Cuadra lawyers would be inappropriate.

If assigning Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers to represent Harlow Cuadra was an attempt to “convince” Cuadra that he should plead guilty to something, it seems that move may have backfired.

If President Judge Mark Ciavarella steps into this case again to keep Bryan Kocis’ lawyers as Harlow Cuadra’s lawyers, It Seems that A Jackie Musto-Carroll DA’s Office is signaling that it might just drop all charges against Cuadra and Kerekes rather than participate in a Freak Show Trial in which the Accused is represented by The Victim’s Lawyers.

Incoming DA Musto-Carroll Names First Assistant

November 22, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

It seems clear now that lawyers for the Luzerne County DA’s Office and the Luzerne County’s Public Defender’s Office can be PART-TIME, meaning that they work for the County and also have private practices. It just seems so fahking bizarre that a Judge would assign one of Bryan Kocis’ lawyers to act as Harlow Cuadra’s Public Defender. While we predicted the prosecution of Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes would be a FREAK SHOW, we never imagined that it would become This Much of a Freak Show. On What Fucking Logic does a Judge assign the Victim’s Former Lawyer as the Accused’s Public Defender?

On Tuesday, District Attorney-elect Jackie Musto Carroll announced Tokach would be her top assistant when she takes office … The first assistant job pays about $85,000 per year. The Citizens Voice

The Grieving Relatives of Bryan Kocis

November 21, 2007 in Freak Show Trial by Freak-Show-Trial

<center> [attachmentid=1980] <br>The Severed Head of Bryan Kocis Morphed to Eight Legged Freak Spider</center>
Testify. I just saw a presentation on PBS on “Athens: The First Democracy“. It turns out that the word TESTIFY originated from the fact that people had to hold the testes of an animal in their hand when they spoke in Courts in old Athens. Testes … Testify.

You know the drill today. In criminal trials, Prosecutors have the grieving relatives UP FRONT in the Court Room so the jury can see them. I think it is also “customary” for the grieving relatives to let out a loud cry whenever any shocking photos of the crime scene are displayed. For example, when The Prosecutors present a photo of Bryan Kocis’ Severed Head Morphed To Eight Legged Freak Spider in Court, the grieving relatives are suppose to let out a loud cry and scream: “Look What They Done To Ma Boy”.

I just wonder how sympathetic anybody in Luzerne County is going to be over Bryan Kocis being dead. The biggest CONCERN of The Community in Luzerne County appears to have been that Kocis wasn’t a Registered Sex Offender. AND THEN,

There is the question of the proceeds from Bryan Kocis’ Enterprises. Where is the money? Shouldn’t there be some Government Agency FREEZING the money Bryan Kocis made from his enterprises just as Virginia Beach FROZE the assets of Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes. Prostitution is as illegal in PA as it is in VA and, paying someone money to perform sex acts in a video is as much prostitution as being and escort. How is RICO appropriate for Boybatter.com and out of the question for Cobra Video?

Every Witness in The Bryan Kocis Murder

Again and Again, we come back to the question of how could there ever be a trial for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes in Luzerne County without all of Luzerne County becoming one big national joke? What person in Bryan Kocis’ life would voluntarily consent to testifying about their contact with Bryan Kocis under oath?

I can’t see any one of Bryan Kocis’ Lawyers voluntarily taking the witness stand.

I can’t see any one of Bryan Kocis’ employees / business associates voluntarily taking the witness stand.

What witness is without some kind of TAINT as a result of their association with Bryan Kocis?