<center>Is It Safe?<br> <br> Marathon Man</center>
Imagine the torture of sitting in Luzerne County Pennsylvania right now praying that The Feds don’t investigate your part in completely altering Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea some four years after the fact.

“Clerical Screwup in Bryan Kocis Sex Offender Case” Adultfyi.com

Clerical Error Blamed for Megan’s Law Confusion WNEP
[attachmentid=3294] [attachmentid=3295] [attachmentid=3296]

Persons Involved With Bryan Kocis’ Plea Change

Is it really all that hard to see where this road is leading?

The Judge who changed Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea in 2006, Michael Conahan has plead guilty to a crime and is scheduled to serve 7+ years in prison.

The guy (Paul McGarry ) quoted in the above article as head of the Luzerne County Probation Department in 2002 (the department that would have “processed” Bryan Kocis registering as a Sex Offender under Megans Law) is reportedly under investigation by The Feds and his boss, Sandra Brulo, has just plead guilty to obstruction of justice by illegally altering court records to hide her involvement in the Juvenile Court Scandal.

McGarry was also the person who signed one page unadvertised agreements with Judge Michael Conahan’s Brother-in-law Dr. Frank Vita

The county paid Vita $1,122,025 to perform psychological evaluations between July 2001 and June 2008 and received more than $800,000 in reimbursements from the state Department of Welfare, according to an audit prepared by the agency.

McGarry ignored state and county protocol by entering into one-page agreements with Vita, without the required approval of the chairman of the county commissioners, according to the audit. Standardspeaker

ALL PARTIES INVOLVED in the 2006 Change to Bryan Kocis’ Guilty Plea admit that they altered the original guilty plea from what was recorded – there doesn’t seem to be all that much of a mystery about how this little sordid tale is going to end.

Harlow Cuadra’s Lawyers

Amazingly, even though Harlow Cuadra did make a reference to Bryan Kocis’s conviction at his murder trial, Cuadra’s lawyers apparently DID NOT seize on that opportunity to move for the recusal of the Luzerne County DA. The Defense Attorneys DO NOT appear to have any post trial motions planned over the Luzerne County DA’s apparent conflict of interest. In fact,

Cuadra’s Defense Attorneys seem satisfied to simply blame Cuadra’s conviction on Cuadra being a poor witness and on Joseph Kerekes.

It made no legal sense for Joseph Kerekes to testify to what Cuadra’s lawyers claim Kerekes agreed to do and, no doubt, Kerekes has a private lawyer who advised him of such. The jury would not likely have believed Joseph Kerekes claiming that HE killed Bryan Kocis (contrary to what he said in his guilty plea) and Kerekes testifying to such could have exposed Kerekes to more criminal charges and made it more difficult for Kerekes to get his guilty plea thrown out.

It is really hard to see exactly what Cuadra’s Defense Attorneys’ strategy was. Other than blaming the murder on Joseph Kerekes, there doesn’t appear to have been any planned list of witnesses for Cuadra’s defense. If Cuadra hadn’t testified, The Defense Attorneys would then have had no witnesses for Cuadra’s defense. AT THE VERY LEAST, The Defense could have called a lawyer to the stand to testify that contracts to perform in adult videos are not valid and enforceable.

Contracts to perform sex acts for money are void and unenforceable and yet Cuadra was convicted of killing Bryan Kocis because Sean Lockhart was contractually bound to Kocis and Cobra Video

Isn’t this sorta kinda weird?

Harlow Cuadra had / has a legal right to a fair trial before a fair an impartial tribunal.

There is a growing indication that Joseph Kerekes and Harlow Cuadra may have OTHER LAWYERS who have assumed that a not guilty verdict was impossible and who decided to concentrate on appeals and courts outside of Luzerne County AND The Feds filing criminal charges over Kocis’ 2006 Guilty Plea change.

[attachmentid=3292]

WILKES-BARRE – A Luzerne County jury has found Harlow Cuadra guilty of first degree murder and all 11 other counts. The verdict was just announced … Because it’s a capital murder case, the jury will now have to decide whether Cuadra should be sentenced to life in prison or death. Timesleader

<center> <br> Harlow Cuadra carrying Sean Lockhart</center>

[attachmentid=3286]

Did Harlow Caudra Drop The Bomb on Luzerne County Prosecutors?

Cuadra said he was referring to his childhood when he was molested by his stepfather, and Kerekes kept drilling into him that Kocis had a conviction of possession of child pornography.

“That’s what Kerekes told me, that I got revenge. It all ended up twisted in that statement,” Cuadra said. Timesleader

Harlow Cuadra took the witness stand in A Strategic Defense Move that frankly appears bizarre on its face. However, an emotionally charged seemingly indirect reference to Bryan Kocis 2002 Guilty Plea may in fact have been the only legal means by which Cuadra’s attorneys could have gotten around Judge Peter Olszewski prohibiting Defense Attorneys from referring to Bryan Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea. In fact, it appears to me that.

<center>The Bomb Has Been Droppped</center>

Bryan Kocis plead guilty in 2002 to a child molestation charge that required that Kocis register as a Sex Offender under PA’s Megans Law. However, Kocis did not register as a Sex Offender.

It has been rumored that TWO INDIVIDUALS with a long standing legal dispute with Kocis contacted the Commonwealth of PA Megans Law Officer in 2006 with a complaint that Kocis did not register as a Sex Offender in 2002 as required. Subsequently, Bryan Kocis 2002 Guilty Plea was ALTERED / CORRECTED by Judge Michael Conahan, The Luzerne County DA’s Office and Defense Attorney Al Flora, Jr in 2006. As we have reported here many times, We are of the opinion that The Luzerne County DA should have recused itself from the Bryan Kocis murder investigation as a result of The Luzerne County DA’s office participation in the 2006 “Correction” to Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea.

Harlow Cuadra may not now be able to claim that The Luzerne County DA had a motive to want Bryan Kocis Dead, however, Cuadra can claim selective prosecution by the Luzerne County DA charging that Sean Lockhart and Grant Roy were not charged, more likely than not, because Prosecutors wanted to keep Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea out of any Murder Trial.

It now remains to be seen whether or not Harlow Cuadra’s lawyers will seize upon Cuadra’s APPARENT casual reference to Bryan Kocis’ CONVICTION to have Luzerne County Prosecutors removed because of a conflict of interest associated with the Luzerne County DA’s Office “altering / correcting” Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea in 2006.

Harlow Cuadra taking the witness stand is clearly a rather daring and kamikaze-like move from Harlow Cuadra but a move which actually may have been the only legal way for Cuadra to force the issue of Luzerne County DA’s Conflict of Interest into Cuadra’s Trial.

It is our understanding that Judge Peter Olszewski granted a Prosecution motion to prevent Defense Attorneys from raising Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea at Cuadra’s Trial. It is very obvious that Cuadra has in fact raised Kocis’ 2002 guilty Plea at this trial.

A review of your information makes clear that Mr. Cuadra may
move to recuse the District Attorney’s Office if he feels that there is a conflict of interest.

It is well within Mr. Cuadra’s power to fully litigate this issue at his trial. For that reason, the U.S. Department of Justice declines to intervene. US Attorney’s email reply to The Bitchless Blog.

Forcing The Recusal of The Luzerne County DA’s Office

We feel that we have accomplished our task to see to it that The Luzerne County DA’s participation in altering / correcting Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea was raised and litigated IN PUBLIC by The Defense Teams for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes. AND, as you would imagine, we don’t see any way around the fact that The Luzerne County DA’s should recuse itself from The Bryan Kocis Investigation and The Prosecutions of Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes.

Quite frankly, Harlow Cuadra’s little description of the murder doesn’t really play all that well because, as I understand the facts, there weren’t any defensive wounds on Bryan Kocis’ hands and body to suggest that Kocis fought with his attacker. However, none of what Harlow Cuadra has testified to amounts to a hill of beans if Cuadra can use what he has done to force the Recusal of The Luzerne County DA

While I personally would not have recommended The Route that Harlow Cuadra and his Lawyers have taken to Introduce Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea into Cuadra’s Murder Trial, if it works then THE HOW doesn’t Matter.

If Cuadra can now force the Recusal of The Luzerne County DA’s Office, the entire Bryan Kocis Investigation, Cuadra’s Murder Trial and Joseph Kerekes’ Guilty Plea should ALL GO DOWN IN FLAMES as The Tainted Actions of a Prosecution with a A Conflict of Interest.

<center> <br> Butt Sexing Murder Trial Witnesses Joseph Kerekes and Justin Hensley</center>

Only in Fuck-ed Up Fucking Luzerne County Pennsylvania could you have a murder trial is which there is video of almost every major player in the murder trial having butt sex.

Bryan Kocis – not only did Kocis produce butt sex videos (before losing his head), Kocis videotaped himself butt sexing a 15 year old boy.

Sean Lockhart / Brent Corrigan – do we need to go in to Sean Lockhart’s extensive butt sexing history

Joseph Kerekes – not only plead guilty to killing butt sexer Bryan Kocis, Kerekes is himself a butt sexer. In fact, Kerekes butt sexed Justin Hensley, the Prosecution’s witness against Kerekes’ lover Harlow Cuadra.

The Lovely Lovely Harlow Cuadra – mind numbingly stupid Prosecutors actually displayed a gigantic image of Harlow Cuadra Nekkid to the Jury. Tell me something, if you are the poor son of a coal miner with no chance of ever seeing Primo Manass in your life, would YOU vote to give The Lovely Lovely Nekkid Harlow Cuadra the death penalty? I’m just saying …

[attachmentid=3274] [attachmentid=3275]

From The Bitchless Blog to The US Attorney

Thank you for responding to my email.

It is my understanding that Mr. Harlow Cuadra and his Defense
Attorneys may in fact be BARRED from referencing Bryan Kocis’
2002 guilty plea and as a result, barred from asserting any
conflict of interest claim associated with the Luzerne County DA
prosecuting Mr. Cuadra when The Luzerne County DA was involved
in making alterations to Bryan Kocis’ 2002 guilty plea in 2006..

In early 2008, Newspapers in Luzerne County reported that the
Luzerne County DA filed a motion with Judge Peter Olszewski to
prevent Cuadra from referencing murder victim Bryan Kocis’ 2002
guilty plea when Cuadra was at the time represented by attorneys
from Luzerne County’s Conflict Counsel Pool of Attorneys
(attorneys appointed to their positions by Judges Michael
Conahan and Mark Ciavarella).

Two individuals involved in an ongoing legal battle with Murder
Victim Bryan Kocis are rumored to have contacted The
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 2006 complaining that murder
victim Bryan Kocis did not register as a Sex Offender under
Megans Laws as was required by Kocis’ originallly recorded
guilty plea. The subsequent alteration / correction to Mr.
Kocis’ original guilty plea by Judge Conahan and The Luzerne
County DA’s Office retroactively justified Bryan Kocis never
having been registered as a Sex Offender under PA’s Megans Law.
There appears to be some criminality (third degree felony)
involved if Mr. Kocis did in fact improperly evade the
requirements of PAs Megans Law.

Again, thank you for your time in responding to my email.

From The US Attorney to The Bitchless Blog

A review of your information makes clear that Mr. Cuadra may
move to recuse the District Attorney’s
Office if he feels that there is a conflict of interest. The
fact, however, that the District
Attorney may have found legal merit in a motion to correct the
record, does not in itself create a
conflict of interest. It is well within Mr. Cuadra’s power to
fully litigate this issue at his
trial. For that reason, the U.S. Department of Justice declines
to intervene.

<center> <br> Sex for Sale </center>
The Jury in Harlow Cuadra’s Murder Trial can’t properly deliberate on the motive Luzerne County Prosecutors are claiming Cuadra had to kill Bryan Kocis without instructions from Judge Peter Olszweski on the legality and enforceability of Fuck Contracts.

It is settled law everywhere in America that Bryan Kocis could not legally contract with Sean Lockhart in any way shape or form (neither via a “modeling” contract nor through an Alleged Verbal Settlement Agreement) for Lockhart to perform sex acts for money. We are however talking here about Luzerne County Pennsyvlania. So, The question still remains …

Will Luzerne County Judge Peter Olszweski Instruct The Jury in Harlow Cuadra’s Murder Trial that Sean Lockhart’s Verbal Settlement Agreement with “Bryan Kocis / Cobra Video” was a valid and enforceable contract?

I don’t think Luzerne County Prosecutors would have come this far with their Freak Show Murder Trial, their idiot claims about valid fuck contracts and their REPRESENTATION that Sean Lockhart was contractually bound to Bryan Kocis Cobra Video if Luzerne County Prosecutors didn’t fully expect that Judge Peter Olszweki would instruct the Jury in Harlow Cuadra’s Murder Trial that Bryan Kocis could legally contract with Sean Lockhart to pay Lockhart money to perform sex acts in the production of Cobra Videos

So, based on Lockhart’s testimony, Luzerne County Prosecutors are claiming that Joseph Kerekes and Harlow Cuadra killed Bryan Kocis over A Verbal Fuck Contract.

Based on newspaper reports about Sean Lockahart‘s testimony at Harlow Cuadra‘s murder trial, Lockhart is NOW claiming that it was The Verbal Settlement Agreement between him and “Cobra Video” that was the valid and enforceable contract that contractually bound him to Bryan Kocis / Cobra Video. There was no Written Settlement Agreement between Lockhart and Bryan Kocis at the time Lockhart and Roy met up with Kerekes and Cuadra in Las Vegas.

This little Infamous Settlement Agreement Between “Cobra Video” and Sean Lockhart et. al. was signed in California as a Settlement of a lawsuit in Federal Court in San Diego, California.

What is probably most bizarre about Luzerne County being DETERMINED to claim that Sean Lockhart was contractually bound to Cobra Video as Harlow Cuadra’s motive for killing Bryan Kocis is that Luzerne County Prosecutors probably had more than enough evidence to convict Harlow Cuadra WITHOUT THAT IDIOT FUCKING MOTIVE. In fact, the motive Luzerne County Prosecutors are so determined to perpetrate probably goes more toward CREATING REASONABLE DOUBT for Cuadra than in convicting Cuadra.

AND, one is left to assume that the reason Luzerne County Prosecutors are determined to claim that Sean Lockhart was contractually bound to Cobra Video is that they want to establish the foundation for Bryan Kocis’ Estate Suing Lockhart once Harlow Cuadra is convicted and for insuring that Bryan Kocis’ Estate gets 20% of whatever Sean Lockhart earns as Brent Corrigan.

[attachmentid=3258]

<center> </center>
We are actually amazed that The Luzerne County DA and Judge Peter Olszweski are continuing with a murder trial for Harlow Cuadra when they know full well that The US Attorneys Office has a criminal investigation under way against The Luzerne County Court System.

It must be assumed at this point that Judge Olszweski must have granted The Luzerne County DA’s motion to prevent Harlow Cuadra’s Defense Attorneys from bringing up Murder Victim Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea in re Kocis having sex with a 15 year old boy.

Bryan Kocis’ originally recorded guilty plea in 2002 was to a crime that required that Kocis register as a Sex Offender under PA’s Megans Law. Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea was then “corrected” in 2006 by Judge Michael Conahan, The Luzerne County DA’s Office and Defense Attorney Al Flora, Jr in such a way that Kocis was then not required to register as a Sex Offender. Conahan, The Luzerne County DA and attorney Al Flora, Jr maintained that Kocis’ orginally recorded guilty plea was a clerical error.

It is our understanding that it is a third degree felony to circumvent the requirements of PA’s Megans Law.

The Letter We Listed Here Asking The US Attorney To Investigate The 2006 “correction” to Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea WAS EMAILED BY US TO THE US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE.

Setting Up Sean Lockhart for De-Frauding Bryan Kocis Part II

The very fact that Judge Peter Olszweski stopped The Bryan Kocis Murder Trial to advise Sean Lockhart that he might be incriminating himself, when Lockhart testified to mis-representing his age to Bryan Kocis, strongly suggests that these Luzerne County People have something special planned for Sean Lockhart.

Accepting money to perform sex acts in adult videos is criminalized in America and the production of Adult Videos is criminalized everywhere in America except in California. So, why didn’t Judge Peter Olszweski advise Sean Lockhart that Lockhart could be incriminating himself when Lockhart testified that he performs in gay videos for a living?

17 year old Minor De-Frauds 44 year old Decapitated Pedophile – Film at 11:00

The reason WHY the production of adult videos is criminalized in America (except in CA) is because it is illegal to contract with someone for sexual services. It was illegal for Bryan Kocis to pay Sean Lockhart money for Lockhart to perform sex acts in the production of gay videos.

Only in Luzerne County Pennsylvania could a “legal argument” be made that a decapitated pedophile was a victim of fraud because a 17 year old minor mis-represented himself as being 18 in order to prostitute himself in the production of gay bareback videos.

When what you are CONTRACTING for is illegal, it is difficult to claim that you were a victim of fraud – even when your head is still attached, you don’t have 28 stab wounds and you haven’t been burned over 80% of your body.

For example, it would be against The Doctrine of Unclean Hands for A Guy To Sue A Cocaine Dealer For Fraud Because The Cocaine Dealer Sold The Guy a Substance That Was Only 20% Cocaine?

[attachmentid=3255]