<center>Is It Safe?<br> <br> Marathon Man</center>
Imagine the torture of sitting in Luzerne County Pennsylvania right now praying that The Feds don’t investigate your part in completely altering Bryan Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea some four years after the fact.

“Clerical Screwup in Bryan Kocis Sex Offender Case” Adultfyi.com

Clerical Error Blamed for Megan’s Law Confusion WNEP
[attachmentid=3294] [attachmentid=3295] [attachmentid=3296]

Persons Involved With Bryan Kocis’ Plea Change

Is it really all that hard to see where this road is leading?

The Judge who changed Kocis’ 2002 Guilty Plea in 2006, Michael Conahan has plead guilty to a crime and is scheduled to serve 7+ years in prison.

The guy (Paul McGarry ) quoted in the above article as head of the Luzerne County Probation Department in 2002 (the department that would have “processed” Bryan Kocis registering as a Sex Offender under Megans Law) is reportedly under investigation by The Feds and his boss, Sandra Brulo, has just plead guilty to obstruction of justice by illegally altering court records to hide her involvement in the Juvenile Court Scandal.

McGarry was also the person who signed one page unadvertised agreements with Judge Michael Conahan’s Brother-in-law Dr. Frank Vita

The county paid Vita $1,122,025 to perform psychological evaluations between July 2001 and June 2008 and received more than $800,000 in reimbursements from the state Department of Welfare, according to an audit prepared by the agency.

McGarry ignored state and county protocol by entering into one-page agreements with Vita, without the required approval of the chairman of the county commissioners, according to the audit. Standardspeaker

ALL PARTIES INVOLVED in the 2006 Change to Bryan Kocis’ Guilty Plea admit that they altered the original guilty plea from what was recorded – there doesn’t seem to be all that much of a mystery about how this little sordid tale is going to end.

Harlow Cuadra’s Lawyers

Amazingly, even though Harlow Cuadra did make a reference to Bryan Kocis’s conviction at his murder trial, Cuadra’s lawyers apparently DID NOT seize on that opportunity to move for the recusal of the Luzerne County DA. The Defense Attorneys DO NOT appear to have any post trial motions planned over the Luzerne County DA’s apparent conflict of interest. In fact,

Cuadra’s Defense Attorneys seem satisfied to simply blame Cuadra’s conviction on Cuadra being a poor witness and on Joseph Kerekes.

It made no legal sense for Joseph Kerekes to testify to what Cuadra’s lawyers claim Kerekes agreed to do and, no doubt, Kerekes has a private lawyer who advised him of such. The jury would not likely have believed Joseph Kerekes claiming that HE killed Bryan Kocis (contrary to what he said in his guilty plea) and Kerekes testifying to such could have exposed Kerekes to more criminal charges and made it more difficult for Kerekes to get his guilty plea thrown out.

It is really hard to see exactly what Cuadra’s Defense Attorneys’ strategy was. Other than blaming the murder on Joseph Kerekes, there doesn’t appear to have been any planned list of witnesses for Cuadra’s defense. If Cuadra hadn’t testified, The Defense Attorneys would then have had no witnesses for Cuadra’s defense. AT THE VERY LEAST, The Defense could have called a lawyer to the stand to testify that contracts to perform in adult videos are not valid and enforceable.

Contracts to perform sex acts for money are void and unenforceable and yet Cuadra was convicted of killing Bryan Kocis because Sean Lockhart was contractually bound to Kocis and Cobra Video

Isn’t this sorta kinda weird?

Harlow Cuadra had / has a legal right to a fair trial before a fair an impartial tribunal.

There is a growing indication that Joseph Kerekes and Harlow Cuadra may have OTHER LAWYERS who have assumed that a not guilty verdict was impossible and who decided to concentrate on appeals and courts outside of Luzerne County AND The Feds filing criminal charges over Kocis’ 2006 Guilty Plea change.

[attachmentid=3292]