<center> [attachmentid=1772] <br> Bryan Kocis’ House</center>
This is very strange …

It has been our position from the “git-go” that there would not be any murder trials for Harlow Cuadra and Joseph Kerekes; that there was no chance in Hell that Sean Lockhart would voluntarily set foot in Luzerne County (and, I would note, it does not look very good for The State if The State’s Star Witness is AFRAID of The State and The State’s Star Witness has to be FORCED to appear at a trial in Luzerne County by Court Order).

Any murder trial into who killed Bryan Kocis would be the biggest freak show ever in the history of the American Justice System by virture of the Witnesses that would testify at such a trial and the details of Bryan Kocis’ life and times in Luzerne County. In our opinion, nobody in public office in Luzerne County would walk away from a Bryan Kocis Murder Trial without being tainted by Bryan Kocis. Well,

It looks like “The Powers That Be In Luzerne County” are also of the opinion that there won’t be any murder trial over who Killed Bryan Kocis. Bryan Kocis’ house has been destroyed, before any trial, before any preliminary hearings for Cuadra and Kerekes and before those rumored “additional arrests”. If there are still more people to be arrested and more arrested people to retain lawyers to defend them in re The Bryan Kocis Murder Scandal, would The State have given the go ahead to destroy the alleged murder scene?

The demolition drew a small crowd of about a dozen neighbors Friday morning. Michael and Nancy Parsons, who were Kocis’ closest friends on the street, said it was almost alarming to see the home fall so quickly. When the claw of the huge excavator bit through the wall of Kocis’ upstairs bedroom, Nancy Parsons noticed some of his clothes still hanging in the closet … Soon, his remaining personal possessions, which were not salvageable after the fire, fell into a heap on top of the foundationCitizen Voice

Almost as strange as the fact that the alleged murder scene has been destroyed is the quote in the Citizen Voice that there was still photographic equipment in Bryan Kocis’ house when the house was destroyed. According to the Arrest Affidavit for Harlow Cuadra, The State is claiming that Cuadra and Kerekes stole photographic equipment from Kocis’ House. Maybe it’s just me but, wouldn’t you think that, in order for The State to argue that Cuadra and Kerekes STOLE photographic equipment from Kocis’ house, that ALL of the known photographic equipment that Kocis possessed would be kept under lock and key as critical trial evidence?

The Citizen Voice article also claims that clothing belonging to Bryan Kocis could still be seen in Kocis’ closet.

Bryan Kocis’ Camera

And on the matter of that camera Harlow Cuadra had that “looked like” a camera that Bryan Kocis had.

Are we to assume that it is impossible to determine if a camera in Harlow Cuadra’s possession was purchased at the same electronics store where Bryan Kocis shopped? Wouldn’t a camera that belonged to Bryan Kocis have some trace of Bryan Kocis’ DNA?

Since The State clearly has the resources to specifically determine if the camera in Harlow Cuadra’s possession belonged to Bryan Kocis. The fact that The State did not specifically state that the camera Harlow Cuadra had was Bryan Kocis’ property leads me to believe that The State is hoping that a jury will just ASSUME that the camera in Harlow Cuadra’s possession was Bryan Kocis’ camera (based solely on the allegations that the cameras “looked” the same and the serial numbers on Cuadra’s camera were allegedly filed off).

Bryan Kocis’ House As Evidence

What I found most interesting about the video tape I’ve seen of Bryan Kocis’ house is how close Bryan Kocis’ house was to his neighbor’s house.

The Proximity of Bryan Kocis’ house to his neighbor’s house definitely raised questions as to how so much could have allegedly been going on in Bryan Kocis’ house without his neighbors hearing something. AND,

I hate to go all John Wayne Gacy here but, did anyone actually check Bryan Kocis’ basement as if it might have been a “crime scene”? It seems to me that a guy who had “several guns” hidden all over his house might have had one or two “interesting things” buried in his basement.

If I was a Defense Attorney for Cuadra an Kerekes and, I had the “ways and the means”, I would have had DNA testing done on everything in Kocis’ basement and determined how many “bodies” (i.e., different people) may have been in Kocis’ basement at one time or another.

We know that Bryan Kocis definitely did business in his basement. So, DNA tests on furnishings and other items in Bryan Kocis’ basement, you would think, would have shown the presence of a whole lot of guys in Bryan Kocis house. AND, clearly, it would have been almost impossible for The State to prove how long ago or how recent those “individuals” may have been in Kocis’ Basement. Oops,

Something just occurred to me … if Bryan Kocis’ killer DID take a camera from Kocis’ house, isn’t it likely that that camera would have been in Kocis’ “studio”? Wasn’t Kocis’ “production studio” in his basement?